Interesting armour, what you guys think? :)

[Folders]

I am not planning to buy it, but it would be interesting to know if this is a well made armour or not! What do you all think?

 

http://www.ebay.es/itm/161310429032

[TK-0380[TK]]

Nope. That helmet alone is WAYYY off.

[Raintrooper]

Nope.  Very inaccurate.  The cap & back looks like FX, but the faceplate doesn't(?).. Cod is separate from ab plate.. Sniper knee plate looks way off... I'll stop there.  I'm guessing FX recast.  Anyone looking to join the 501st should stay FAR away from this!

[Folders]

I am always amazed how you guys see even the tiny detailes that makes the kit not screen accurate! Thank you, i appreciate the help

[mikedwelle94[TK]]

Seen stuff like this a few times before. Do avoid.

If you *must* buy from eBay, look up MTK (Trooperbay). I hear that is some quality armor.

[DizzyStormtrooper[501st]]

whoever decided recasting FX was a good idea in the first place years ago should be sent to a rebel work camp. might as well buy a rubies

[Folders]

From what i have heard the FX helmet is the big problem, but i have already got good looking helmet so maybe an FX armour for me maybe would not be the worst thing, or maybe it would, i dont really know ^^

[mikedwelle94[TK]]

I think you can do better than FX armor. Considering all the (relatively) cheap and more accurate options are out there.

Edited May 22, 2014 by SolidScrafty

[DizzyStormtrooper[501st]]

its the chest back and ab plate. i like everything else about fx armor. the belled shin bottoms are very boot friendly.