Marv Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 I have a bit of a quandrie. I'm looking to build an E-11 using screen acurate parts. The issue I have is this: On the varient seen here: it uses an M38 but with the embosses no 7 on the side.The M38 has embossed no, but my M40 has no 7. My question is how relevant to the scope selection is the type of scope, i.e. M38 or M40 and the relevance of the numbering on the side? Its not a bad position to be in but am looking to guage opinion. Quote
john danter Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 They used several scopes dude. So which you pick is fine M38, M38 A2 (M40) and M32 (M19). They all look very much like one another, just different in terms of length Here's a good reference for you. http://www.partsofsw.com/e11guide.htm#Scope Quote
SamJ[501st] Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 (edited) Mr Allinger, at approx. 50 seconds, says that the scope is a new addition as part of the restoration and was not part of the on screen E-11 so I wouldn't worry too much. Edited April 30, 2011 by SamJ Quote
Lichtbringer Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 (edited) My real M38 (from 43, but no A2 version) has the 7 on it´s side: ------------- Edited July 31, 2022 by gmrhodes13 link removed no longer working Quote
Marv Posted April 30, 2011 Author Report Posted April 30, 2011 Michael, are those both original M38s? Quote
Lichtbringer Posted April 30, 2011 Report Posted April 30, 2011 No John, only the brasscolored one, with the stripped paint. I disassembled, cleaned, assembled and repainted it - and then it replaced the resin one on my real sterling. Quote
Marv Posted May 3, 2011 Author Report Posted May 3, 2011 (edited) Now that I've sussed how to link to images thought I'd post my little collection from Top to bottom M47-A2, M40, and my two M38s ---------- Edited July 31, 2022 by gmrhodes13 link removed no longer working Quote
Lichtbringer Posted May 3, 2011 Report Posted May 3, 2011 from Top to bottom M47-A2, M40, and my two M38s Seems only the second from above is useable. Quote
Marv Posted May 5, 2011 Author Report Posted May 5, 2011 The M47A2 and M38 (top) are shown with their mounts these are simply unscrewed (if you note the two scopes are mounted in opposite directions). The M38 at the bottom could still be attached to a rail, but with a little metal working could be repaired fully. Quote
Lichtbringer Posted May 5, 2011 Report Posted May 5, 2011 The A2s are wrong shaped, they need the "flat part" (where lighting was/is added) bondoed and sanded. The brasscolored needs it´s frontfeet milled down, the same with it´s other brass-humps on it´s belly. And the No. 4 has a destroid rear feet, needs bondo and sanding, too. Sure, all can be used, one way or another. Bondo and sanding is easy, i could mill the feet down if it was mine - but all that would simulate a shape they didn´t had originally, the M40 is the one with the real shape. If i would be you and have to choose between them, the decision would be easy: First and only winner is the "M40", then long nothing, then fixing the 2 M38. The A2 i would only consider after a loooong search for a better matching variant without success (that´s why they are that cheap, usually not over 50-60$). But as you have the M40 already ........ Bingo. Quote
Marv Posted May 5, 2011 Author Report Posted May 5, 2011 (edited) The M38 (brass with mount removed) ----------- Edited July 31, 2022 by gmrhodes13 link removed no longer working Quote
Lichtbringer Posted May 5, 2011 Report Posted May 5, 2011 Ah, much better. Never trust a pic. Still ... i think the "7" is more prominent/visible as the small engraving M38/M40, surrounded with all the other text. But thats more a personal preference than anything else. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.